Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:20

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ask Ethan: What are the "first stars" in the Universe? - Big Think
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Dying Light: The Beast launches August 22 - Gematsu
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
A new perk for Costco executive members quietly punishes everyone else - SFGATE
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
When was the first time you felt discriminated against because you were female?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Gold-eating fungus could help find metals on Earth and asteroids - Earth.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What was your most memorable combat mission during the Vietnam War?